← Search

Emily Dawson

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 89W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Dawson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-08-17 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aaron Ward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Pohl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · LIB-Rosenwasser 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hunter St Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · LIB-Rosenwasser 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Arthur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adam Dawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Nadia Alchy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · CHIP-Shaw 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susi Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · CHIP-Rusche-Leone 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherri Fountain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · CHIP-Shaw 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-06 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · SCWB-Craft 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadia Alchy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-29 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ariel Wan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 59.7% of games
3.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 65.2% of games
3.5
76.7%
33W–10L · 60.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 58.3% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.4% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 70.3% of games
6.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67.8% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 62% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova