← Search

Ty Wallace

— year-end
43 matches · 32W–11L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Ty Wallace to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Dream Aces · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raj Ahmad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · Dream Team · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with David Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Wilson Thomas / Andrew Smith
2026-08-10 · Dream Team · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with David Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-27 · Dream Team · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Raj Ahmad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-01 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Andrew Wylie / Brian Smith
2026-05-18 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martijn van der Ent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martijn van der Ent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
Andrew Smith / Corbin Paxton
2026-04-20 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · The Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams10 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 69.5% of games
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.2% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert