← Search

Barbara Hancock

Mc Lean, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 31W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Barbara Hancock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Team 2 Called To Serve · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Dague
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
W
2026-07-18 · Team 1 Servivors · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-3
W
2026-06-28 · Team 1 Servivors · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-1
L
2026-06-24 · Team 1 Servivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · Team 1 Servivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Hung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · Team 16 Servivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Dillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · Team 16 Servivors · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-5
W
2026-04-11 · Team 16 Servivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Dillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
L
2026-04-07 · Team 2 Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tariq Haddad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-3
W
2026-04-02 · Team 4 Team Tisch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Hancock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-21 · Team 4 Team Tisch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Huling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-6
W
2026-03-11 · Team 19 Servivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carey Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 66.8% of games
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.5% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe