← Search

Denise Coit

Manhattan Beach, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 28W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Denise Coit to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-08-28 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-09 · BC-MCC/AnneLee(formerlyLeslieLancry7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Fach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · BC-MCC/AnneLee(formerlyLeslieLancry7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Kwasnowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · BC-MCC/MikeYogi8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Luce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · BC-MiraCosta/JuliKanner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Haley Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Mardis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · BC-MCC/MikeYogi8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Derek Brauch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Tuverson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · BC-MCC/MikeYogi8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julio Davila mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Tuverson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · BC-MCC/RachelAlexander4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Karr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Luce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 61% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.4% of games
0.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.9% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 72.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova