← Search

Andi Ramser

Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 62W–40L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Andi Ramser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-07-09 · KY/LOU/RECHTER · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-23 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Amy Scheumann
2026-04-25 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-21 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Sarah Johnson
2026-03-15 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-14 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Laura Morris
2026-03-08 · KY/LOU/REEDER · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · KY/LOU/REEDER · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 70.2% of games
4.0
60.7%
34W–22L · 54.6% of games
4.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 39.6% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.1% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 40.5% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 58% of the time
#1 Singles
58%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer