← Search

Michael Marsh

— year-end
142 matches · 98W–44L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michael Marsh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Brent Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Vincent Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Grant Van Valkenburgh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with David Wells championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Dong-Ha Chung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with David Wells championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · #4 Doubles · with David Wells championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Stoffer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Laflamme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · Stoffer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-2
W
2026-07-23 · Northern: Time Stand Still · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Westfall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · I Think I'm Going Bald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Hook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Thomas Hickey / David Koch
2026-07-15 · Northern: Wolverines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams32 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
100%
12W–0L · 77% of games
4.0
71%
22W–9L · 59.1% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.9% of games
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 58.1% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 61.8% of games
8.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
33 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer