← Search

Daniel Waldram

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 48W–52L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Daniel Waldram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-20 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-18 · Love Means Nothing · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Celita Skelton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Celita Skelton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · Boise Bear Down · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry Prendergast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · Boise Bear Down · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Espinola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · What the Deuce · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Boise Bear Down · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry Prendergast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · What the Deuce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Tomyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Boise Bear Down · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · What the Deuce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Rushall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · What the Deuce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John McGee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.7% of games
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 61.5% of games
3.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 54.4% of games
4.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 27.9% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 43% of the time
#1 Singles
43%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal