← Search

Hayley Charnaw

SAN JOSE, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 24W–21L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Hayley Charnaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lawrence Roseman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Walicek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pulin Thakkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Riggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethan Vu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Afendakis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vonda Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-12 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW3.5A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vonda Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 57.7% of games
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 38.4% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Singles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams