← Search

Gina Mannion

Bel Air, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 60W–28L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Gina Mannion to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Flaherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-09 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Archibald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Flaherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-05 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maya Shertzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · Fleming 40+3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabrina Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Maya Shertzer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Amy Lovas / Sarah Boyd
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Rebecca Pape championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Rebecca Pape championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Fleming 40+3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maya Shertzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-27 · Fleming 40+3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maya Shertzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 62.4% of games
3.5
75%
18W–6L · 58.9% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.7% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe