← Search

David Schneider

Cave Springs, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 7W–18L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add David Schneider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Palladino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Palladino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Palladino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Palladino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-31 · Ciulla/Rogers/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victor Guzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-03 · Ciulla/Rogers/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-24 · Ciulla/Rogers/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–7L · 35.7% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.1% of games
3.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer