← Search

Yasuko Tagawa

Livonia, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 52W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Yasuko Tagawa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-31 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brad Stieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Koji Yanagisawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tetsuya Nakajima mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-24 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thuan Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-13 · SCWB-Serwatowski 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Brekke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amira Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-06 · SCWB-Serwatowski 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharbari Joshi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 69.8% of games
3.0
50%
24W–24L · 51.2% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.3% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.8% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.4% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert