← Search

Brigitte Wright

Alpharetta, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 48W–17L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Brigitte Wright to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Keddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Joanna Shook / Kimberlie W Ensley
2026-06-11 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 7-6
W
Laura White
2026-06-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalia Barrero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-17 · Windward Lake Club (Jonna Giles)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · Windward Lake Club (Elizabeth Keddy)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alma Batista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-16 · Windward Lake Club (Elizabeth Keddy)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Verroi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 67.8% of games
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.2% of games
4.0
64%
16W–9L · 54% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 57% of the time
#1 Singles
57%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova