← Search

Chrissy Capati

Hilo, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 57W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Chrissy Capati to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-06-14 · 7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ty de Silva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · 7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ty de Silva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · 7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Kunimoto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · Rackettes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Cabarloc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · Rackettes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Tanaka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · Kimi 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ty de Silva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Kimi 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ty de Silva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-08 · Kimi 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ty de Silva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Racketts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Oliverio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-21 · Kimi 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ty de Silva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · Racketts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Junette Nakamura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-04 · Racketts · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Taira-Tokuuke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.3% of games
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 66% of games
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 69.4% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 73.3% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 72.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
12%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova