← Search

Chris Stehn

HOPKINS, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 7W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Chris Stehn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2026-03-09 · Parker Winter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max Schumacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-02 · Parker Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Palombi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-16 · Parker Winter · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-02 · Parker Winter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with LaMont Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-26 · Parker Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kurtis Fechtmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-05 · Parker Winter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max Schumacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-11 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Decuir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-13 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Max Schumacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-06 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-30 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Max Schumacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-16 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Max Schumacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-09 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 52.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 34.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#2 Singles
27%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match
#1 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova