← Search

Beth Humberd

Andover, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 48W–28L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Beth Humberd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-09-11 · SFT:Spark White:Sideman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Latham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Zullo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · SFT:Spark-A Green:Warren · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget MacMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · SFT:Spark-A Green:Warren · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Paonessa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · SFT:Spark-A:Red:Sideman/Schiela · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynnell Schiela
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma DeFrancesco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · SFT:Spark-A Red:Barry/Warren · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · SFT:Spark White:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Latham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · SFT:Spark White:Sideman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Latham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 62.4% of games
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 58% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 58.3% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#1 Singles
20%
15 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer