← Search

Elizabeth Danowski

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 11W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Danowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Staton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Huss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-24 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Huss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bufford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · Stonehenge Swingers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-01 · Stonehenge Danowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Bridges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · Stonehenge Danowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Bridges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-04 · Stonehenge Danowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Bridges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 36% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.7% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer