← Search

Jennifer Lora Gleason

Derwood, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 54W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Lora Gleason to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-07-26 · Shenk - Racket Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Ficklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-10 · Jones - Happy Feet · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Storer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Jones - Happy Feet · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denese Cavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-4
W
2026-06-27 · Shenk - Racket Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Shenk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · Shenk - Racket Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Ruskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · Shenk - Racket Rebels · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Punsalan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · Sharma - Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Petrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
W
2026-06-01 · Dickerson 18+ 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Willie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · Sharma - Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roya Hakimzadeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-24 · Dickerson 18+ 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Darling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · Sharma - Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denese Cavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · with Alanna Volatile championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.0
50%
28W–28L · 51% of games
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 62.8% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 65.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe