← Search

Rebekah Teesdale

— year-end
104 matches · 69W–35L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Rebekah Teesdale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Fallahi-Teesdale/40/7.5/CWN/CP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Marcel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-02 · Teesdale-Fallahi/18/6.5/CWN/CP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-31 · Fallahi-Teesdale/40/7.5/CWN/CP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexis Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · Darden/Bisso/40/6.5/CWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Charvat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Teesdale/Fallahi/18/DII/TWN/CP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kahria Hadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ross Klingsberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Teesdale/Fallahi/18/DII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Fallahi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
Kelly Walsh / Angelle Granier
2026-05-28 · Teesdale/Fallahi/18/DII/TWN/CP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Mikhailov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Hagstette/40/3.0/MX/CP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phil Cooke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Kostal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-18 · Hagstette/40/3.0/MX/CP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Armond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Teams32 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 70.1% of games
3.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 57.9% of games
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 54.1% of games
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 65% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 67.8% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe