← Search

Kim Daughdrill

— year-end
66 matches · 42W–24L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Kim Daughdrill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-09-08 · CCM - Smith 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-20 · CCM - Lott/Hunter · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · CCM - Smith 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-17 · CCM - Lott/Hunter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-30 · CCM - Farmer/Reardon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann-Brooks Morrissette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-1
W
2026-06-23 · MTC - McNeil/White · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Collin McConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · MTC - McNeil/White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · CCM - Hunter 40+/4.0 Spring 2026 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · CCM - Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Wing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-20 · CCM - Hunter 40+/4.0 Spring 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hadley Binion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-14 · CCM - Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zue Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-13 · CCM - Hunter 40+/4.0 Spring 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zue Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 71.6% of games
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 52.8% of games
3.5
70%
14W–6L · 56.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.6% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.7% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#1 Singles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal