← Search

Chase Smith

Baton Rouge, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 18W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Chase Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-07-13 · Ragusa/18/Div2/M/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shane Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · Mueller/18/3.0/MD/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Dewitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · Mueller/18/3.0/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen McCurley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · Ragusa/18/Div2/M/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tyson Duplantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · Baggett/18/3.5/M/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyson Duplantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-30 · Baggett/18/3.5/M/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Magnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-23 · Baggett/18/3.5/M/SOAC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-17 · Burns/18/3.0/M/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shane Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-16 · Baggett/18/3.5/M/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karsten Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · Burns/18/3.0/M/SOAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Matthew Porcelli / Michael Baker
2026-03-09 · Baggett/18/3.5/M/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Baggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-18 · Burns/18/3.0/M/SOAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.2% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 45.9% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
5 matches
#2 Singles
11%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer