← Search

Lauren Hollett-Mott

— year-end
35 matches · 10W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Lauren Hollett-Mott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Shuttleworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-04 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Bassano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eleni Pappamihiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donalda Cairney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eleni Pappamihiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-25 · MacLean · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Holliday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · MacLean · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-27 · Henig/Stephanski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Borges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-22 · Henig/Stephanski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Shuttleworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · Henig/Stephanski · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-13 · Henig/Stephanski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-08 · Henig/Stephanski · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steph DuPre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 50% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 53.5% of games
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 38.2% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert