← Search

Samantha Abbott

— year-end
80 matches · 64W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Samantha Abbott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-11 · SAbbott (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peggy Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-10 · KMartin/AWhalan (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Laird Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-31 · MLGarrison (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-28 · SAbbott (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mallory Zvara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · MLGarrison (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Starr Stroud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · MCTA18/Banchik/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Brinneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-14 · SAbbott (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Brinneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Samantha Phifer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · MMetzl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anne Whalan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · SAbbott/ASpanjers (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Austin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · MMetzl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Laird Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-0
W
2026-07-17 · SAbbott/ASpanjers (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.3% of games
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.3% of games
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 65.1% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.1% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 74.5% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 63.4% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer