← Search

Tate Gould

— year-end
27 matches · 20W–7L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tate Gould to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2026-03-03 · Team 1 Doubles The Fun · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bennett Stackhouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · Team 1 Doubles The Fun · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Koshy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
Justin Hill / Mark Shen
2025-11-04 · Team 8 Challengers · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Simon Storm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-27 · Team 8 Challengers · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bryan Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-09-14 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cesar Martino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-09-13 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cesar Martino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-07 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitchell Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Abe Adams / Tim Kane
2025-09-02 · Team 2 Courtmasters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Daguiar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Connell Loftus championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-08-09 · Team 2 Courtmasters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Valdez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-28 · Team 2 Courtmasters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Valdez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-12 · Team 4 Courtmasters · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 68.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 57.7% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
6 matches
#1 Singles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams