← Search

Joe Rouse

MOUNT PLEASANT, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 27W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Joe Rouse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-09-09 · LCTA18/Sides/CTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Claudio Carrara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-07 · LCTA18/Sides/CTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gary Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-27 · LCTA18/Sides/CTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with John James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · LCTA18/Sides/CTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gary Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-26 · LCTA18/Rouse/CTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · LCTA18/Rouse/CTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-16 · LCTA18/Rouse/CTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Polovoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-02-12 · LCTA18/Rouse/CTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Bumgarner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-29 · LCTA18/Rouse/CTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-04 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-1
W
2025-11-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Bumgarner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-13 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 63.6% of games
4.0
45%
9W–11L · 48.8% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.6% of games
8.5
0%
0W–5L · 25.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#2 Singles
17%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova