← Search

Clara Gonzalez Flores

Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 44W–29L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Clara Gonzalez Flores to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Billingsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Billingsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Hilliard/Tuhro 18s 3.0W Singles Sunday · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Adams 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rodrigo Lara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Hilliard/Tuhro 18s 3.0W Singles Sunday · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · Adams 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rodrigo Lara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Feaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Billingsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PM · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · Adams 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rodrigo Lara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · Gonzalez 18s 3.5W Singles Tues PM · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 68.4% of games
3.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 63.2% of games
3.5
20%
3W–12L · 42.6% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.8% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
15%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer