← Search

Kelsey Wilmore

— year-end
26 matches · 19W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Kelsey Wilmore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Kingman/Hogue/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Ashley Johnson / Lauren McLaughlin
2026-08-25 · Kingman/Hogue/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Kingman/Hogue/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Kingman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-07 · Babu/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Ouellette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-31 · Babu/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Tidwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Ashley Johnson / Preeti Arla
2025-11-13 · Hogue/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Corder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-06 · Hogue/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-10-24 · Babu/Hambridge/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Ouellette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-21 · Babu/Hambridge/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-10-20 · Hogue/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Corder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-10-13 · Hogue/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-06 · Hogue/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams11 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.2% of games
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.8% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
15 matches
#1 Singles
15%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams