← Search

Jana Gibas

Spartanburg, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 14W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jana Gibas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-09-02 · SATL18/JStone/CCS · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alexandra Dillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · SATL18/TWheeler/CCS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Teague
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · SATL18/TWheeler/CCS · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · SATL18/JStone/CCS · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Poppy Adair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Emilee-claire Carter / Lina Miraziz
2026-08-05 · SATL18/JStone/CCS · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Angie Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · SATL18/IAllen/CCS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Douglass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · SATL18/IAllen/CCS · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-15 · SATL18/BDouglass/CCS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cole Reutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
Heath Flood
2026-04-02 · SATL18/IAllen/CCS · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-01 · SATL18/BDouglass/CCS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandi Douglass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-26 · SATL18/IAllen/CCS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Lancaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Amanda Rogers / Mary Lee Cole
2026-03-11 · SATL18/BDouglass/CCS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 68.7% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.9% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams