← Search

Allison Alexander

Morganton, NC
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 22W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Allison Alexander to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Staci Shafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitzi Arrowood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Spillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Thomas/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-28 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-21 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Elena Willging / Kathy Collins
2026-07-20 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Priscilla Faucette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Deanna Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-13 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 61.5% of games
3.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 44.4% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0%
0W–6L · 30.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 65% of the time
#1 Singles
65%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert