← Search

Brie Soler

Greenville, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 31W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brie Soler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-09-11 · UPTA40S/Allen/Pavilion · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-28 · UPTA40S/Allen/Pavilion · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · UPTA40C/Zeimetz/Pavilion · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Surles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · UPTA18TL/Pelino/Pavilion · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Misela Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · UPTA40TL/Cooper/Hwy14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Pelino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-26 · UPTA18TL/Herford/Neely Farm · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jordan Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · UPTA40M/King/Hwy14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Zaniewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · UPTA40TL/Cooper/Hwy14 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Joan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · UPTA18TL/Herford/Neely Farm · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Gunderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-18 · UPTA40TL/Cooper/Hwy14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · UPTA40M/King/Hwy14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Zaniewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · FTA40A/Pavilion/Cruickshank/Wallace · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Gossmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games
3.0
76.7%
23W–7L · 59.8% of games
3.5
21.7%
5W–18L · 39.5% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
13%
8 matches
#3 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe