← Search

Bridget Shoemaker

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 69W–35L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Bridget Shoemaker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
Jennifer Berg / Julie Harris
2026-09-11 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Beal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Lemke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvette DeLisio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jillian Roach / Michelle Miller
2026-07-22 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvette DeLisio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Huan Li / Melissa Chang
2026-07-15 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Lemke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Lemke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Oldenquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Kusovski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-08 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Libby Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Scali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-17 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Scali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-23 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvette DeLisio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
69.6%
48W–21L · 57.3% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.7% of games
5.5
60%
6W–4L · 49.7% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 70.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer