← Search

Lauren Blazar

Mission Hills, KS
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 76W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lauren Blazar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
Kristen Paulmeyer
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-4
W
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexis Bernthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kathryn Bannister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Tina Bond / Kristin Stoddard
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · with Erin Gustafson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
Shino Hyde / Divya Manohar
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · with Mallory Plungkhen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Shannon Rogers / Katelyn Sweeney Ching
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · with Paige Salveter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cheryl Liang Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cheryl Liang Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-20 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bree Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cheryl Liang Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.6% of games
4.5
80.7%
46W–11L · 63.5% of games
5.0
50%
4W–4L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#1 Singles
32%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal