← Search

Denise Rathmann

Marietta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 17W–10L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Denise Rathmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Bree Graves / Kimberly Turner
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 2-6
W
Laura Salisbury / Madison Ritter
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Celia Friedman / Lexie Usher
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Levan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-17 · Fair Oaks TC (Bev Sentell)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
Janet Thomas / Kate Wilson
2025-12-06 · Fair Oaks TC (Bev Sentell)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-22 · Fair Oaks TC (Bev Sentell)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Levan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 7-5
W
2025-11-15 · Fair Oaks TC (Bev Sentell)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-11-08 · Fair Oaks TC (Bev Sentell)* · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Follett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-13 · Fair Oaks TC (Bev Sentell)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.9% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer