← Search

Hannah Fogle

Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 9W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Hannah Fogle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Delaney Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Madia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Kristin Pike / Megan Foley
2026-07-01 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Madia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Melissa Montgomery / Christina Prather
2026-05-27 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Groswald Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
Mary Ellen Ball / Chrissy Ryan
2026-05-13 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Delaney Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cecilia Waterman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cecilia Waterman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
Karen Roberts / Tina Myrick
2025-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Delaney Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
Qiyun Song / Erin Bognar
2025-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cecilia Waterman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-12-04 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cecilia Waterman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-6
L
2024-11-13 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anna Funke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cecilia Waterman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 34.7% of games
5.5
50%
7W–7L · 48.8% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams