← Search

Hayley Hackett

Little Rock, AR
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
72 matches · 30W–42L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Hayley Hackett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brandilyn Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-12 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · ATA Team/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-25 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Sholes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-24 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Hayley Hackett/LR/LRAC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · ATA Team/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 51.3% of games
3.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 41.3% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 60.5% of games
2.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.7% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 29.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#3 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer