← Search

Brandon Lucio

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 51W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brandon Lucio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-09-07 · BLucio (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Luney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-03 · GEstrada (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carter Connelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luke Albertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-31 · BLucio (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charlie Drain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · GEstrada (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carter Connelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luke Albertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-24 · BLucio (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-20 · GEstrada (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Atiba Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Taylor Brown / Daniel Tsuei
2026-08-17 · BLucio (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charlie Drain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luke Albertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · JMorse (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · GEstrada (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carter Connelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 43.2% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.6% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.1% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 53.4% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe