← Search

Xizhen Palmer

Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
66 matches · 35W–31L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Xizhen Palmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-08-02 · WHRC-Ha · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yongseok Cheon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · NOR-WHRC-Palmer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Schreiber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-26 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lani Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · WHRC-Ha · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tochukwu George mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · WHRC-Ha · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tochukwu George mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lani Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lani Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · NOR-WHRC-Palmer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Schreiber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-13 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jing Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-12 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jing Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Azure Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 54.2% of games
3.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.6% of games
2.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 53.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
29 matches
#1 Singles
36%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer