← Search

Alexa Stanfield

Riverside, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 32W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Alexa Stanfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-07-11 · IE-CCCC-Knoblach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dang Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Chad Brantley / Anhtu Pham
2026-06-13 · IE-CCCC-Knoblach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dang Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · IE-CCCC-Knoblach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Cocker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-24 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-22 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-03-09 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie McNaughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 63.8% of games
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal