← Search

Kristain Ledford

— year-end
52 matches · 19W–33L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kristain Ledford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with FARRIN ABLES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Charlotte Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with ANN CARTER COWART
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Fairhope - Grissom/Kaempfer · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Caroline Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Fairhope - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Hovater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Fairhope - Grissom/Kaempfer · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Chelsea Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Denise Seale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · Fairhope - Grissom/Kaempfer · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Abigail Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-03 · Fairhope - Grissom · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Grissom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-26 · Fairhope - Rogers · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams17 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.3% of games
3.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.1% of games
5.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova