← Search

Jean Marie Schelb

Gilford, NH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 37W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jean Marie Schelb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-06-02 · GH:Skinner:Loescher · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Lieberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · GH:Skinner:Loescher · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Alperin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · GH:Skinner:Loescher · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammie Tischler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-28 · GH:Skinner:Loescher · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Alperin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · GH:Skinner:Loescher · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Alperin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-15 · GH:ShotSisters:Merkle:Lefebvre · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-01 · GH:ShotSisters:Merkle:Lefebvre · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-10 · GH:Noe:Belanger · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-03 · GH:ShotSisters:Merkle:Lefebvre · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-17 · GH:ShotSisters:Merkle:Lefebvre · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-10 · GH:Noe:Belanger · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Larissa Lezama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-21 · GH:ShotSisters:Merkle:Lefebvre · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 57.5% of games
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal