← Search

Nital Patel

— year-end
76 matches · 59W–17L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Nital Patel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-09-03 · MBY - Misner/Baxter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirstie Ivey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · Homewood - Haines/Lowery · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-18 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennet Jumayeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Homewood - Haines/Lowery · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Markham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Meredith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Homewood - Haines/Lowery · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Markham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennet Jumayeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Patel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Crump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Patel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Crump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-13 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Patel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Annie Crump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · Homewood - Haines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-17 · Homewood - Haines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams27 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
14W–0L · 75.2% of games
3.5
88.9%
32W–4L · 66.8% of games
4.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#1 Singles
24%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer