← Search

Jane Woolley

Holladay, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 82W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jane Woolley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Cottonwood Club-Summerhays/Winson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Winson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Child
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Bethers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Annunziata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krissie Summerhays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Diaz Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Rachel Mills / Tiffany Ujifusa
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Kerry Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krissie Summerhays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beata Kieffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
90%
18W–2L · 64.4% of games
3.0
69.2%
36W–16L · 58% of games
3.5
61.9%
26W–16L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Singles
10%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova