← Search

Dina VanderWaal

Minneapolis, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 21W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Dina VanderWaal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-07-13 · Soberg: 3.5 Slice Squad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Horgen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · Soberg: 3.5 Slice Squad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nehal Desai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Soberg: 3.5 Slice Squad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Trescher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Soberg: 3.5 Slice Squad · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · Graham: Tennis the Menace · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · Graham: Tennis the Menace · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Graham: Tennis the Menace · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Harris
2026-05-18 · Soberg: 3.5 Slice Squad · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · Graham: Tennis the Menace · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Trescher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · Soberg: 3.5 Slice Squad · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · Trescher/VanderWaal · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-31 · Trescher/VanderWaal · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Trescher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.1% of games
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 33% of the time
#2 Singles
33%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams