← Search

Lauren McWilliams

— year-end
21 matches · 10W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lauren McWilliams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-08-31 · 5.5 18+ HCC Langford · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Candace Baye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · 5.5 18+ HCC Langford · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Candace Baye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-28 · Taninbaum-HCC-18's 2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Draughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Bayley Alexander / Emily Walker
2026-04-13 · Taninbaum-HCC-18's 2.5 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-30 · Taninbaum-HCC-18's 2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Morgan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · Taninbaum-HCC-18's 2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Draughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-31 · Langford 2025 HCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Hays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
Michelle Wilson / Jennifer Weatherell
2025-03-03 · Langford 2025 HCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Love Owen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-12-14 · Langford HCC · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-12-07 · Langford HCC · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-12-01 · Langford HCC · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-11-18 · Langford HCC · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.4% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
2 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match
#3 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova