← Search

Amy Hood

Liberty, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 13W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amy Hood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Gerleman, Sarah · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Noiles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Gerleman, Sarah · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Naomi Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Gerleman, Sarah · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Noiles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Gerleman, Sarah · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · Gerleman, Sarah · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Noiles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-03-08 · Gerleman, Sarah · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Gerleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · Gerleman, Sarah · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Gerleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-22 · Gerleman, Sarah · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Gerleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-13 · Gerleman, Garrett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Wilhelmi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · Gerleman, Sarah · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-18 · Gerleman, Sarah · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Gerleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-12-14 · Paul, Jayme · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Dittmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#1 Singles
27%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert