← Search

Natasha Chevalier

— year-end
80 matches · 39W–41L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Natasha Chevalier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-25 · CCP CHEVALIER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-24 · RTC SULLIVAN/DESENSI-WILLIS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Trammell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · CCP CHEVALIER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ailene Tubbesing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-03 · RTC SULLIVAN/DESENSI-WILLIS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorein Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · RTC SULLIVAN/DESENSI-WILLIS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with MaryAnne Criswell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · CCP CHEVALIER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malavika Nambiar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · CCP CHEVALIER · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molonga Nanyongo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Sarah Manning / Ildiko Lingvay
2026-05-24 · Seay · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Manisone Norkeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · Seay · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Manisone Norkeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · Seay · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim McMeans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · ATC VARGHESE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Chevalier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · CCP CHEVALIER/CHEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauri Horton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams35 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.2%
30W–14L · 55.8% of games
3.5
15%
3W–17L · 37.1% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#1 Singles
25%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe