← Search

Amber Sands

Littleton, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 9W–3L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Amber Sands to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
L
2025-08-06 · SS-LT ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stevie Vencil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-23 · SS-LT ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-07-09 · SS-LT ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-02 · SS-LT ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-06-11 · SS-LT GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Renard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-04 · SS-LT GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Vatter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Stacy Johnson / Jean Duggan
2025-05-21 · SS-LT GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Renard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Beth Hines / Priscilla Hawkinson
2025-05-16 · SS-LT GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Renard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-05-14 · SS-LT GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Renard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-05-21 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tig Ogdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-05-14 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tig Ogdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-05-07 · CCC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Robyn Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert