← Search

Jennifer Tramer

Novelty, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 17W–7L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Tramer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-07-08 · A18 3.0W CRC Zidar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andria Garten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-4
W
2026-07-06 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ximena Pardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Zidar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · A18 3.0W CRC Zidar · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Zidar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Shoemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ximena Pardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neeti Wyckoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · A18 3.0W CRC1 Falberg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kata Pagon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · A18 3.0W CRC1 Falberg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neeti Wyckoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · A18 3.0W CRC1 Falberg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ximena Pardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-21 · C 5.5W CRC1 Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Megan Misencik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-09-21 · C 5.5W CRC1 Goldsmith · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Vinocur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 61.4% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova