← Search

Candace Galiffa

Chadds Ford, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 30W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Candace Galiffa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-06-20 · Blue Moons · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Rossino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · Martinis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-05 · Martinis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katharine Sharon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · Slice Girls PO · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bajaj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · Martinis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Slice Girls PO · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bajaj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Slice Girls PO · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Erin Muhly / Sandra Simpson
2026-05-01 · Blue Moons · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Vicinanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · Slice Girls PO · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Berstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · Blue Moons · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Vicinanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-04-16 · Slice Girls PO · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-11 · Lord of the Strings · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Colley-Holgate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 67% of games
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 56.6% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#1 Singles
29%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert