← Search

Lindsay Reid

— year-end
23 matches · 17W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Lindsay Reid to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-07 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Bol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-09 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liyan Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · Absolutely Smashing 3.0 Singles/MacEwan/Burbank · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · Simply Smashing/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-16 · Simply Smashing/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Moffat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethan Waldman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · Absolutely Smashing 3.0 Singles/MacEwan/Burbank · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethan Waldman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.6% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
10 matches
#1 Singles
30%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe