← Search

Adrianne Daem

Lewisville, TX
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 13W–17L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Adrianne Daem to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-09-11 · OAK DAEM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Landes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-29 · OAK DAEM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Landes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · OAK VARMA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Caley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-30 · OAK VARMA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Priscilla Vinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-22 · OAK VARMA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Maack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-01-16 · OAK VARMA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Landes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-24 · OAK DAEM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacie Dearing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-17 · OAK DAEM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Landes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-10 · OAK DAEM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Landes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-03 · OAK DAEM · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-19 · OAK DAEM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Landes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-12 · OAK DAEM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Landes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
3.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#1 Singles
20%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer